November 02, 2001
Source: DJ Jones, ARMAROK
Advocates for Recovery through Medicine of Arkansas/Oklahoma
http://www.arm-advocates.org/menu.php
ARM is on the CSAT list of Advocates
http://www.health.org/csat/advocates.htm
Dear Colleagues:
There is a significant drug interaction between Ciprofloxacin and
Methadone. Cipro may
inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 up to 65%. Since this is the
primary enzyme responsible
for metabolizing methadone, Cipro may elevate methadone levels
significantly. That this can cause a clinical opioid overdose is
demonstrated in the
attached article, which I have also appended to the end of this email,
for those of you who can
open neither Acrobat (PDF) nor Wordperfect files. This is
potentially significant and
serious for an unknown (but certainly non-zero) proportion of Methadone
patients. Because of the stigma of methadone treatment, patients
often do not share
information about their methadone use with health care providers (other
than clinicians involved in
their OAT). Many Americans are, or soon will be, taking
Ciprofloxacin to prevent potentially lethal pulmonary anthrax.
Methadone patients who do
this may need to lower their dose of methadone to prevent potentially
dangerous overdose.
Information about this interaction needs to go out ASAP to the medical
community in general, and to OAT providers and patients in particular.
I have already contacted the JAMA medical news staff, who would be
glad to include this
information in the next available news from health agencies column, but
that will not be until the November 21 issue. I have also
contacted Mark Parrino.
I believe that we need to put out a press release/advisory ASAP
and especially target the
media in the DC area, New York, New Jersey, Florida and
the Postal Workers union, as well as the methadone patient advocates and
public health officials.
This does not mean that methadone patients cannot take Cipro.
It merely means that their methadone dose may need adjustment and that they
and their medical providers need to be informed of this. It is
unclear what effect Cipro
might have on LAAM kinetic, possibly an acute lowering of NorLAAM and
DinorLAAM levels, with a consequent, but short lived, withdrawal
syndrome. Patients on LAAM
who start Cipro should probably have Extra EKG's to be sure that
the QT interval does not rise above 480 msec during the acute changes,
until the new levels
stabilize.
Any thoughts you have on these bio-medical issues or how to get the
word out will be much
appreciated, sincerely,
Alan Trachtenberg, MD, MPH, Adjunct Associate Professor,
George Washington University Medical Center, and Uniformed Services
University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), and Medical Director, Office
of Pharmacologic and Alternative Therapies (OPAT), Center
for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), Substance
Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), United
States Public Health Service (USPHS) atrachte@samhsa.gov
OR voice: 301-443-1281
fax: 301-480-7505 cell:301-792-3980
official homepage: http://www.opat.samhsa.gov
Methadone, ciprofloxacin, and adverse drug reactions Karin Herrl,n,
M~rta Segerdahi, Lars L Gustafsson, Eija Kalso Lancet 356:2069-70.
12/16/2000 Research Letters.
Ciprofloxacin, given to a patient successfully treated with methadone
for more than 6 years,
caused profound sedation, confusion, and respiratory depression. We
suggest that this was caused by ciprofloxacin inhibition of CYPIA2 and
CYP3A4 activity, two of the
cytochrome p450 isozymes Invoived in the metaboilsm of methadone.
A 42-year-old woman in pain because of Ogilvie s syndrome (chronic
intestinal pseudo-obstruction)
was managed successfully with oral methadone 140 mg/day for
more than 6 years (panel). She was admitted to an internal medicine ward
because of urosepsis. 2
days after introduction of oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily)
the patient became sedated and confused, and required an extended hospital
stay. Ciprofloxacin was replaced by co-trimoxazole and the patient recovered
within 48 h. Later, ciprofloxacin was reintroduced three times in three
different departments because of relapsing urinary-tract infections, and
the patient became sedated
on all occasions. On the last occasion the patient developed
heavy sedation and respiratory depression, but immediately became alert
with increased respiratory frequency when given naloxone (04 mg) intramuscularly.
On each occasion, after discontinuation of ciprofloxacin, the
patient regained her normal alertness. On the second and third occasions
the patient had the same
concurrent medication as at the first occasion, however on
the fourth occasion venlafaxine had been replaced by fluoxetine (panel).
The terminal half-life of methadone is about 30 h with a wide range.
Adverse effects are similar
to other opioids. The most serious adverse effect of methadone
is respiratory depression. Low concentrations mainly reduce respiratory
rate whereas higher doses also diminish tidal volume. The metabolites
of methadone are not considered to be pharmacologically active.
Recent studies indicate that the cytochrome p450 isozymes CYP1A2,
CYP2D6, and CYP3A42 are
involved in methadone metabolism. Methadone concentrations were reported
to have increased in 13 addicts after initiation of fluvoxamine and fluoxetine,
respectively. Fluvoxamine is a strong inhibitor of CYP1A2 and fluoxetine
is a strong inhibitor of CYP2D6; the interaction would indicate that methadone
is metabolised by both GYP 1A2 and CYP2D6. Ciprofloxacin is a
quinolone antibiotic and a potent competitive inhibitor of CYP1A2.
Ciprofloxacin is metabolised to 55¯75% and partly excreted, unchanged in
the urine. The inhibitory potency of ciprofloxacin was determined by
calculating the decrease in
GYP 1A2 activity after addition of ciprofloxacin into a medium for
human liver microsomes, which caused a 70% reduction in the GYP
1A2-mediated demethylation
rate of caffeine in vitro.3 Furthermore, the activity of CYP3A4 was
depressed by 65% in human hepatic microsomes by ciprofloxacin.4 Thus,
there are two common enzymes for ciprofloxacin and methadone which
implies a potential for a pharmacokinetic drug interaction. In addition
to the suspected pharmacokinetic interaction, contributing factors have
to be considered.
The patient was a smoker with, presumably, an induced CYP1A2 enzyme capacity
that may have counted for a larger part of methadone metabolism than
in non-smokers. Thus, the inhibition of CYP1A2 by ciprofloxacin may have
had a greater impact in
this patient than in non-smokers. During the suspected interaction
the patient also had an infection (panel).
Theoretically, increased methadone concentrations due to inhibition
of CYPIA2 and CYP3A4, may
be more pronounced in patients who are poor metabolisers via
CYP2D6, but this patient was a normal extensive metaboliser. However,
she was on venlafaxine
which is a moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor. Interestingly, at the last occasion
venlafaxine had been replaced by fluoxetine which is a stronger inhibitor
of CYP2D6 than venlafaxine, and the adverse opioid effect was more severe
compared with the first three occasions.
Naloxone reversal of the respiratory depression strongly suggests
that the respiratory
depression was caused by methadone. It is probable that ciprofloxacin
caused raised concentrations of methadone through enzyme inhibition.
The patient was given the drug combination four times, thus, there
were three positive rechallenges. This illustrates that even if the
patient has been informed
about a drug interaction, the drug could be re-administered if
the patient is admitted to a different department. Furthermore, this
case illustrates that
long-term use of methadone does not protect from overdosing due
to interaction. According to a scale developed to estimate the
probability of adverse drug
reactions; this case was assessed as a definite drug interaction.
An interaction between methadone and ciprofloxacin has not been
reported previously. Both
methadone and ciprofloxacin are already in widespread clinical use
and with the increasing consumption of methadone, both in maintenance programmes
for drug addicts and as an analgesic for both cancer and non-malignant
chronic pain, patients treated with methadone will be encountered in
family practice as well as in several other specialties.
This pharmacokinetic drug interaction needs further clinical
investigation, including
the measurement of serum methadone enantiomers, because methadone metabolism
is suggested to be stereoselective. We suggest that clinicians are more
aware when methadone and ciprofloxacin are given concomitantly and that both
clinicians and patients should be given more information about
potentially dangerous
interactions between methadone and other drugs.
We thank Eva Gothason and Aqueta Heller at the Division of Pain Management,
for their cooperation and data collection. This work was supported
by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (3902) and the
Swedish Cancer Fund (3948).
I
Eap CB, Bertschy G, Powell K, Baumann P. Fluvoxamine and
fluoxetine do not
interact in the same way with the metabolism of
the enantiomers of
methadone. J Clin Psychophannacol 1997; 17:
113¯17.
2
Iribarne C, Dreano Y, Bardou LG, Menez IF, Berthou F.
Interaction of
methadone with substrates of human hepatic
cytochrome P450 3A4.
Toxicology 1997; 117: 13¯23.
3
Fuhr U, Anders E-M, Mahr G, Sorgel F, Staib AH. Inhibitory
potency of quinolone
antibacterial agents against cytochrome
P4501A2 activity in
vivo and in vitro. Anrinzign,b AgcutN Chenithe,
1992; 36: 942¯48.
4
McLellan RA, Drobitch RK, Monshouwer M, Renton KW.
Fluoroquinolone
antibiotics inhibit cytochrome P450-mediated
microsomal drug
metabolism in rat and human. Drug Metab Dispos
1996; 24: 1134¯38.
5
Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, er al. A method for estimating
the probability of
adverse drug reactions. Cli,, Pharmacol Ther 1981;
3O~ 239-45.
Division of Clinical Pharmacology at the Department of Medical
Laboratory Sciences and Technoiogy (K Herrlin MO, L
L Gustafsson MD), and the Division of Pain Management at
the Department of Anaesthesia and intensive Care (M
Segerdahi MO, E Kalso Mo), Karoiinska institutet at Huddinge University
Hospltai, Huddinge, Sweden
Correspondence to: Dr Karin Herrlin. Division of Clinical Pharmacology,
Huddinge Univers~tV Nosp~tal. S-141 86 Nuddrnge, Sweden
(e-mail: Karin.Herrlhn@Iabtek.ki.se)
Clinical data including drug history for a patient at the time of a
suspected drug interaction
(first exposure) between methadone and ciprofioxacin causing heavy
sedation, confusion, and respiratory depression Medical hlstoiy Ogilvie*s
syndrome (pseudo-obstruction) Dose
and route of administration of methadone Methadone (mixture
140 mg) since 6 years Dose
and route of administration of ciprofioxacin
Ciprofloxacin (tablet 750
mg) since 2 days indication for ciprofioxacin treatment Urosepsis Continuous
concurrent medication and main route of elimination Metabolised
at least partly by CYP1A2 None Metabolised
at least partly by CYP2C19 Omeprazole (tablet, 20 mg twice daily)
Metabolised at least partly by CYP2D6 Venlafaxine
(tablet, 75 mg twice daily)* Metabolised
at least partly by CYP3A4 Runitrazepam (tablet, I. mg)
Metronidazole (tablet,
400 mg twice daily)t
Nitrazepam (tablet, 5
mg when needed to a maximum of
four tablets/day)
Other routes of elimination
Cyclizine (tablet, 50 mg)
Furosemide (tablet, 40
mg)
Paracetamol (tablet,
500 mg when needed to a maximum of
eight tablets/day)
Propantheline bromide
(seven 15 mg tablets/day)
Smoking Yes
Kidney function (as
measured by serum creatinine) Normal
Uver function (as measured
by ALT, albumin, and iNR) Normal
*Venlafaxine was replaced
by fluoxetine at the time of the fourth exposure
to ciprofloxacin.
t=Continuous prophylaxis at the time of the first exposure.
Metronidazole was then
discontinued and not given at the time of the last
three exposures. INR=lntemational
normalised ratio. ALT=alanlne transferase. |